home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=91TT0752>
- <title>
- Apr. 08, 1991: Money Angles
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1991
- Apr. 08, 1991 The Simple Life
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- BUSINESS, Page 54
- MONEY ANGLES
- "Dear IRS..."
- </hdr><body>
- <p>By Andrew Tobias
- </p>
- <p> I finished my taxes today, which isn't much to crow about
- when you consider that they were my 1989 taxes. (Hope to finish
- 1990 next week. Big job. Been busy.)
- </p>
- <p> It's not that I was late. No, I got my 1989 taxes in right
- on time. But then a few weeks later I got a note from the
- Internal Revenue Service. It was a nice note, as these things
- go. The IRS computer has definitely been through charm school
- in recent years. But "as a result of an error we have corrected
- on Schedule E of your return, you owe IRS...[an arm and a
- leg]."
- </p>
- <p> Well, actually it wasn't an arm and a leg. More like a
- finger. Still, because I had done my return with one of those
- computer software packages that promises no mistakes (and
- because my name and face were on that computer software
- package), I was more than a little curious to know just what the
- error was.
- </p>
- <p> "Yo," I wrote back. "You corrected an error on my return?
- Getcho hands off my return!" Then I tore that up and sent,
- instead, a meek request that they identify my error. Call it a
- sixth sense I have for dealing with bureaucracy.
- </p>
- <p> JUNE 25 Back came a letter from Glynda F. Hankins, chief
- of the IRS taxpayer assistance section, over whose signature I
- would guess 10 billion such letters go out each year, telling me
- the IRS was looking into my inquiry and would try to get back
- to me within 30 days. I was impressed.
- </p>
- <p> AUG. 17 The promised response. Thanking me again for my
- inquiry, it went on to say: "Our records show we received a
- return from you on Apr. 15, 1990; however, it is not immediately
- available. Please send us a newly signed copy."
- </p>
- <p> AUG. 23 Before I could whip off another 30-page return, I
- got, just six days later, yet another nice letter from Glynda
- Hankins, this one informing me that "the information you
- requested is enclosed." Except that it was not. Enclosed instead
- were a copy of the basic "who must file" instructions (someone
- had underlined, in purple, the paragraph about widows and
- widowers) and a photocopy of a death certificate for a man named
- Clyde Majors, who had died in 1988 of "myocardial infarction due
- to a ruptured esophagus." ("WARNING:" read the bottom of the
- death certificate the IRS had photocopied for me, "Any
- reproduction of this document is prohibited by law.")
- </p>
- <p> "I am sympathetic to the enormous task the IRS is charged
- with," I wrote back, "but as you can imagine, it is hard for me
- to understand what Mr. Majors' esophagus might have to do with
- the error on Schedule E of my return." I went on to explain
- that, lest this turn into some sort of nightmare in which I
- awoke one day to find my home being loaded onto a truck, I was
- enclosing the disputed amount due, plus interest--but that I'd
- still appreciate knowing, at their convenience, what the alleged
- error was on my Schedule E. I knew that if I turned out not to
- owe the money, I'd eventually get it back with interest.
- </p>
- <p> SEPT. 26 A letter arrived acknowledging my letter and
- promising a response within 30 days. Like all the others, this
- one closed with, "We apologize for any inconvenience we may have
- caused you, and thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely,
- Glynda F. Hankins." And I must tell you that, even though it's
- naturally just a form letter, that kind of touch--to me at
- least--makes a difference.
- </p>
- <p> NOV. 2 "The information you requested is enclosed.
- Sincerely Yours, Glynda F. Hankins." No death certificate this
- time. Just a blank 1989 Schedule E. Nothing else.
- </p>
- <p> "I already have plenty of blank tax forms," I wrote back.
- "But at your convenience..."
- </p>
- <p> NOV. 28 A letter came from Glynda Hankins acknowledging my
- letter and promising a response within 30 days.
- </p>
- <p> JAN. 29 Ta-Dah! Here was a copy of my 1989 Schedule E,
- which someone had marked in red to show that Lines 32 and 33
- didn't add up to Line 34. Bingo! It hadn't even occurred to me
- to look for that kind of error, for if there's one thing a
- computer can do, it's add.
- </p>
- <p> As it happens, my return was correct--the numbers only
- appeared not to add up. (If you care: included in Line 34 were
- numbers from a supplemental schedule of additional partnership
- investments that wouldn't fit on the main form. It was a
- legitimate glitch. My software should have made it clearer to
- the IRS's software that supplemental numbers were being included
- in Line 34. Their software should probably have known to look.
- It serves me right for investing in so many stupid partnerships
- in the first place.)
- </p>
- <p> Points to be made:
- </p>
- <p>-- Don't assume the IRS is always right. The telephone
- advice they render is correct only about 91% of the time,
- according to a Money magazine test--admittedly a dramatic
- improvement from prior years.
- </p>
- <p>-- Don't assume your accountant is always right. My
- mother's taxes are done by a top tax attorney who relies on a
- large professional software package. But in checking the return
- he prepared, I found, and he confirmed, that his software had
- her paying $2,000 too much.
- </p>
- <p>-- Don't be afraid to correct your mistakes. The form you
- need is a simple two-pager, Form 1040X. You specify which
- year's taxes you are correcting, show the correct new amounts
- and explain the changes. Contrary to myth, IRS agents don't sit
- around waiting to pounce on these things. The IRS swears that
- filing a 1040X does not increase your chances of being audited,
- and considering how busy the IRS is these days, that is probably
- true. If you owe more tax, the 1040X lets you make a clean
- breast of it. If you paid too much, you'll get a refund. There
- are only three parts to the 1040X, and Part III inexplicably is
- devoted entirely to letting you change your mind about whether
- you want $1 of your taxes to go to the Presidential Election
- Campaign Fund.
- </p>
- <p>-- Don't give up. The apparatus is in place, even if it's
- a little creaky, to try to deal with your problem in a civilized
- way.
- </p>
- <p>-- Don't even think about inviting Glynda Hankins to
- lunch. She is very, very busy.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-